Showing posts with label thought dump. Show all posts
Showing posts with label thought dump. Show all posts
0 com

thought dump 5

My day to day movements are somewhere between reflexive and habituated. They are more habituated than reflexive, but odd moments or different conversations might make me different, at least a bit from my mean self for a moment. The same goes for my mind and process of thinking. Most of my thoughts are habituated and ingrained within me. But this time it's a combination of reflexive and habituated.

Profound discoveries are usually the product of connecting seemingly unconnected details in a meaningful way in order to deduce a simple idea that binds them, and others in the same vein of being, together.

You can learn a lot about a person by examining their reflexes and habits. It's like mind reading. Most of the time, we can't contain our mind, and it leaks through things we do. Some people more than others. Instigating people brings these inner mechanics out faster.

There's an idea called "index to character" that serves this function in literature. Often, an author would place a seemingly daft and openly abrasive character within their novel so that the reader might garner some clues about the character from how they act and react to them. Often the seemingly noble characters are revealed to be assholes because you can determine a lot of someone's character on how they act towards a seemingly less intelligent or lower status person. Great and dignified people are shitty indexes to character because everyone is naturally inclined to treat them nicely anyway. Although it is a literary term, the idea still works in real life. How people treat seemingly stupid people, mentally handicapped, or disadvantaged minority's reveals a great deal about their prejudice and inner asshole self that wouldn't be revealed otherwise.

Parts of a person always seep through the hints they say or do. Parts of themselves they want to hide have a tendency to pop out during pressured or tense times. Or in moments of prejudice. Prejudice, or the fear of loving someone different than you, is usually a function of fear. Fear which translates into insecurity.

I'm still dwelling on the idea of resolution. I think life is always a process of "becoming" but it's not necessarily important what it is you strive to become because I don't think that there is an ideal version of self to obtain. Well, there may be in the religious realm, but those models are unrealistic to actually ever obtain. Same goes for relationships.
0 com

thought dump 4

Today, I read a love letter that Tupac wrote to his girl when he was 17. I like Tupac because he was fearless and was able to love people compassionately. I am going to sign all my letter from now all something like "For eternity' or "with everlasting love" or something corny like that. I want to be fearless like that.

Waves

Most people are searching for resolution. Resolution in different things all the time. For example, the existence of God is comforting because it affords a resolution to the meaning of life. A relationship is a solution for loneliness, perhaps even marriage for some. Finding a job or securing some sort of wealth provides a resolution for the twenty-something instability. I want resolve in my life. At the same time, I fear that any sort of long lasting conclusiveness will take away my emotions and make me limp and satiated. I constantly feel longing and fire for things I don’t have, and I become a person that is deserving of those things. To steal from batman, it’s like a dog chasing an ice cream truck. Every day he chases the truck and becomes faster and faster whilst doing so, until one day he catches up to the truck. Then what? You don’t got the answers sway. Answers are the not the answers. I don’t give a fuck if that doesn’t make sense or if it’s pretentious. Just becoming is an answer in itself, because sometimes things are better unresolved because it leaves room for God to work and for possibilities to emerge, instead assuming with narrow conceit.

It’s something I learned from music. Most people don’t know anything about music. Apart from the simple constructive claim of “I like it”, or “I don’t like it”, there’s much else to be really gleaned from other people’s opinions. Apart from celebration or condemnation from initial instinct, the truth of the matter is that a layperson has no real base to criticize an artist. Critics can, but they are critics the same way a soldier becomes a stool pigeon, carrying messages back and forth from the base to the battlefield. So in that sense, even a critic does not hold a very honorable position.

I think the first instinct is to characterize the opposite love as the lack of it – apathy. But I think the opposite of love, or that which represses it and exists as it’s counterpart, is being afraid. Fear drives the human heart away from love. Apathy is just the state in which that love is not present. Love is a verb –apathy is a state. Loving brings you somewhere like being joyful or something –a state. Being afraid brings you to apathy, or sometimes disgust and insecurity. After a while, after trying to love and failing, I think people have a tendency to be more afraid. Afraid of relationships, afraid to be vulnerable. Exposing that portion of sensitive self can lead to pain, because trust given can be broken and that sucks. As people grow older, they become more fearful, the more they have lost parts of themselves through loving difficult or selfish people, often time selfish themselves. And really connecting with people becomes near impossible. People become cold and distant, unwilling to make friends or even acquaintances with people, only keeping a tight circle of folks they can trust fully. A coward dies a thousand deaths, but the valiant live and die only once. Of course, I am afraid to be hurt, but I can be less afraid because chances are cooler. Heartbreak you can get over, and live and learn. The idea of a person becoming broken and mended over and over again seems sordid, and although I don't know if its true (neither do I care because I don't think it'll happen to me – knock on wood) I still imagine that it'll be ultimately worth it, as long as one is willing to grow and learn from mistakes. The idea of meeting a soulmate and not being with that person due to fear of losing seems like hedging your bets. I tend to go for a more crash and burn mentality than having things slowly fade away. I think more things happen when people are reckless – not stupid reckless though. You give way to chances and possibilities, and even though things may be lost due to impulsive decisions, who knows. It was probably meant to be like that anyway. MAYBE.

The idea of finding some I can love for a really long time scares me. If it is possible or not. Love is an active choice, not a feeling. Feelings inevitably fade. Through constant effort feelings might be able to last a couple years – but a lifetime? They have to be sustained though a conscious and deliberate choice. Too-selfish people cannot make that choice over a prolonged period of time. So I guess it’s not a question of finding that person, it’s more of a question of finding someone I am willing to love till I die, and hoping that person will reciprocate. More and more I am feeling that maybe even if you find the ‘perfect match’ or suitor, it won’t work out between selfish people. It doesn’t matter if you’re perfect for each other if you don’t realize that loving each other will eventually be a conscious and deliberate choice after the initial feelings fade. Sure, it won’t be glamorous but that’s life. Feelings come and go.

How do I become a better person? Truth be told, I am not even that much interested in becoming a better person. I actually want to be more liked, more attractive, better at music, and have more friends. I want to be loved much more than I want to be a better person. Somehow in my mind I connected that if I become a better person, I can be more loved. Although that may be true, it’s a coward’s method of self betterment.

I am conflicted and emotional. Much more than before, I think. Or at least a couple months back. I was largely emotionless for the year before that. I think I was drained. Looking back makes me sad. Losing love sucks. I am impulsive and selfish. I think I still am. But there are always other things to do than be sad and mope around. Going to school, reading books, watching movies, making music, talking to friends takes my mind off of those things. Or they did, till they mattered less and I repressed them. Now I am relatively normal as myself. I think I am an emotional person, although I wouldn’t ever be the first to admit it. I dislike being sensitive.

I am apprehensive about relationships. I don’t like commitment because of the fear that I might lose something I don’t have. But at the same time, I’m a pretty straightforward person, so I won’t evade it like a passive aggressive cunt. But sometimes I wonder if it’s even needed to be apprehensive if the possibility of good relationships in the near future don’t exist anyhow. But I’m not that cynical. I am positive vibes. Positive vibes everywhere.
0 com

thought dump 3

Adjusting my previous observation, I actually think I lose myself in real people and find myself in fictional characters. I think since I was pretty young, I had very bad emotional control. As I grew older, I learned avoidance and disinterest to combat myself from that. These days, I’m finding a decent middle ground as I learn more about myself and who I am through introspection and other people.

Reading some of my old journal stuff really shows a glimpse of what kind of person I was. I was… emotionally insane. Constantly self-loathing and bitter in the most crazy ways. I wonder why I was like that. I ended up hurting people and myself, but everything happens for a reason and I grew from it all.

I don’t like being vulnerable. In fact, I don’t even know why I recently started writing on this blog so much. Even though the stuff on this page is not super vulnerable, it is still rather telling of my inner state of mind — something which I usually hide on a day to day basis (personal journal is a mess lol). Maybe it’s because I want to be understood, and putting it out public holds that sort of hope. I still filter it out and try to write coherently because I don't want to be seen as a whiny little baby. I don’t think the goal of communication is to be understood . Rather, I think communication is an attempt at understanding, an attempt which never be fully realized but still a magical experience at the same time. Kind of like the journey, not the goal thing.

I think most of the times we initially communicate, it’s because we want something, or that the other person has something to offer emotionally. Following this sort of thinking, interest is inherently narcissistic. I mean, the word “interest” brings it all back to me. It’s not to say it’s bad, but rather just an observation. I guess it would be best to break down the barriers of self consciousness and then find out about the person, then understand their heart in a non-self-interested way. I think at some point after that initial encounter, that narcissism backs off and something else takes hold. I’m not sure what to call it, but it is more pure and disinterested.

For some of my close friends, I don’t even find their lives interesting anymore, because I know them so well. But I still love talking to them because understanding their mind makes our connection is meaningful. I understand their heart and it’s nice to see them grow. People constantly develop. That’s why the closeness doesn’t evaporate even after people run out of things to say. Ten years from now, I will be talking about different things with my friends, but the level of intimacy probably won’t change and we would have all grown.

I think I'm actually somewhat emotionally stable and rational thinking. I try not to let my emotions get the best of me, but at the same time admit to the truth that I am really emotional. Not emotional like I was when I was younger, but more developed, conscious and mature.
0 com

thought dump 2

I lose myself in other people all the time, particularly within fictional characters. Or maybe I find parts of myself that were unrealized in real me and engrain them into myself. People are a product of two things: habits and traumas. Finding or losing myself in fictional characters constantly builds up like silt along a riverbed and eventually parts of those characters become a part of me. Sometimes, these traits are admirable and courageous. Other times, they are simply traits that I want to have, but are unrealized in reality. For example, after watching a movie and sitting through two or some hours of some fictional character weave through problems and issues and result somewhat resolved in the end leaves me feeling satisfied. I feel like that character for a short amount of time because it feels real to me. But relatively quickly, like most things in life of this nature, it fades and I revert back to my mean self. I can tell myself things, but that doesn’t really mean that I believe them. I can tell myself I believe in God, but words are just words and the core self of my being might say otherwise. But over a long period of time, after constant and continual exposure to such things, I start believing them. I am a product of my habits and visions and feelings and traumas, and I choose what to take in, somewhat like a filtered sponge. Cinema and books are a huge part of my life. Other people make themselves through bigger things — catastrophes for example. The external world shapes you. But for me I take in the small external world as it comes and choose how it shapes me.

Other times, it happens through other people. Real people that I admire or like. I talk to them, I be with them and I take in parts of them. I don’t know if who I am is real or not. I am not dissociative. I just don’t know how I got here or who I am (in totality. I know some sense of how I got here, but not the whole picture). In a sense I know who I am because I’ve been myself for such a long time, but keeping track of all my influences is impossibly difficult. It’s not crazy either, I think this is the nature of most other people as well. I think I take for granted who I am most of the time. But the real issue comes when I don’t know who I am. Understanding how I got here, how my personality was shaped and how I treat other people on an instinctual level gives me power over myself and my emotions.

There is no escape from who I am. I am stuck with it. I could part with it, but then I would be dead, which I don’t want to be because my life is pretty cool. I could try to escape from myself but it wouldn’t lead to any answers. Maybe other people know me better than I do myself — there are some parts of me that I avoid and neglect. I can learn from that. But am I really mostly a product of fictional things? No I’d say not mostly, but partly. Most of who I am was probably engrained in me from an early age, and that clay has been further molded by me feeling things from other people. For example, my first girlfriend. I was impossible to deal with. I never diagnosed myself but I think I was obsessed in an incredibly negative way. And I was a person that I hated — jealous, self loathing and intolerable. Also ecstatic at one given point and flipped 180 and in deep depression the next moment. I don’t think I was bipolar because I am different now, but the mood swings were incredibly severe. After that relationship, I saw myself retrospectively and saw what an asshole I was. But that’s not me, I hate those characteristics when I see them in other people. But unfortunately I have to accept it because that was who I was. I learned from it, dissociated myself forcibly from those parts of myself and created a new me: better, more emotionally equipped and more positive. I don’t think it’s fake either, I think everyone does it in life. You look back and cringe at past parts of yourself as if that person wasn’t you — because it feels so different. But it is you, obviously. Time doesn’t switch out identities at certain increments of your life. I became who I am because of my experiences, but more so how I retroactively saw my past self. Now I hate those characteristics that I was so much, and I can't see myself acting in that manner again. In short, I grew.

Speaking of past relationships, I think that when I am invested in something/one are the moments where I feel most emotional range. I often question if that’s who I really am, because in a position with close people I becomes less self conscious. In a position when I am totally not self-conscious I feel liberated, but also very different. My freedom feels like a pleasure. It’s like I am free from myself. It’s ironic because when I am alone, it’s different than being with people I am not self conscious with. It’s as if I need other people to validate my experience and who I am. If I was the last person on earth, I wonder how I would act. If there was nobody to validate who I am as wrong, right, insightful, silly, brilliant, stupid, then how would I act?

How did I get here? My instinct and emotions run fast than I can think. Clearly, I can’t keep but it would be more comfortable if I didn’t have to. I guess that’s the benefit of knowing yourself (unless you are naturally a good person).

It’s nice to meet people and really engage with them. There are walls people put up in order to not get hurt. I do it all the time. I felt the past the negative effects of recklessly engage with a person on a too high emotional level. I’m sure other people have felt the same way about me. But it’s nice because it’s good sometimes. I say things all the time but I wonder if I mean them. If I say them enough times, will I eventually those things? It might because those habits might become engrain my personality. But I want to know who I am on a very raw level. In a sense I desire change in order to know who I am.

I think I find other people interesting for either two reasons: 1. because they are fascinating 2. because they are similar. It’s very self consumed in nature, but fascinating people are so different from me that I can learn from them, and other times people are super similar and I can learn from myself from that. I think some people are both but often somewhere between the two extremes. However, I’d like to believe that other people are just awesome and I like to talk or be with them just for that reason. Not anything to do with myself.

That’s what I want. I want to be more compassionate. I get sick of myself relating everything back to me, because I know there is so much more that matters outside of me. But being in my own head, it’s hard to see that.

Currently I see my negative traits as such: lack of compassion, condescending, arrogant, self consumed, often not genuine. But to varying degrees. It’s something that I am aware of and constantly trying to change. I see my positive traits as: creative, insightful, loyal, good to people (I try), focused, and deliberate. All in all, most of my negative traits seem to be coming from some area of being too consumed with myself. Changing myself will come through habits or traumas, and because I can’t crontol traumas, I have to habituate that into myself. I don’t know how. Maybe if I keep telling myself for a long enough time, then I’ll start to really believe it. Not really, I think it comes on a day to day basis on how I treat other people. The reactions that I give to people might be awkward and strange to me at first, but once I habituate them in my personality, then I’ll become more compassionate. I think.

0 com

thought dump

There’s a lot of times I’ve made the mistake of expecting to be understood. I don’t think it’s possible to be fully understood by anyone — its just not possible. The things and emotions that run through our heads can’t ever be fully understood because our mouths and bodies are inexact and insufficient communicators for the loads of shit in our heads. It is possible to communicate well with certain people, different people for different things but it’s a mistake to think that it’s possible to be one-hundred percent understood by one person. Because it’s impossible, there’s always going to trouble when you expect it, particularly in a relationship.

jump

Relationships are funny. One of my least favorite things when people get into relationships is when they stop hanging out with other people, as if they’re meant to only align themselves with one individual that holds capability of fulfilling their needs and understanding their heart. It’s not true; people need different sorts of relationships for different parts of themselves because people have complex needs and circumstances. I want to be understood because I dislike the feeling of loneliness, but I also know that it’s nice to be understood in smaller ways by different people. There’s no one-size-fits-all solution for a human — not like two puzzle pieces that interlock and form a complete whole. I just think that’s just a corny romantic sentiment that lonely people conjure up because they think that their desolation can be solved by the entrance of a perfect human being into their life. To be fair, in concept and theory it makes sense, but in reality, why would a perfect human being find their fulfillment in only one person? I’m talking about understanding on a purely platonic level; I don’t think that polygamous relationships are healthy.

jump

Most of our thoughts get lost in translation most of time, but that’s okay because that’s life. I think talking to people becomes much more relaxed when you taken in the fact the you’re not gonna get everything — it’s not a moment where you shuffle in between each others thought but rather you just try. There’s pleasure in trying, and even more pleasure when you can get through at least a little bit. It’s nice to talk to friends and you just get it and things are properly communicated. There's like, beauty in that moment or something lol

jump

I think recently I’ve been blabbering a lot about “feeling the emptiness of my soul”. I think it’s too pretentious so I’m going to be more exact about it. What I mean is that usually I just feel neutral. I don’t feel anything much of the time, unless there is some external situation that creates an emotional response in me. And then time passes and I revert back to my mean emotional state — neutrality. I looked at some news from seven months ago about the Tianjin explosions and I felt sad — for about fifteen minutes. I empathized with their losses and wondered for a moment what they went through. And then I drank a whiskey — it tasted good so it made me slightly happy — for about an hour, and then I reverted back to neutrality. I think it exists — being joyful. Instead of reverting back to my mean neutrality (feeling nothing), reverting back to a mean joy. I don’t think that means to be estastic and happy all the time, because I don’t think such is possible to sustain, like perma-molly, but more like a fulfilled state of satisfaction. Well, it’s what I’d like to believe. I do believe there’s a permanent sense of balance in the world though, so maybe not. I’m having a pretty good time right now though. I’m not even sure if that’s possible for a twenty-something because I literally have jack shit in terms of possessions and my internal self is begging for some external satisfaction like money and chains.

jump

I laugh when things aren’t funny because laughing makes me feel like I’m understanding what people are talking about — and understanding feels good. My contention is that people talk to be understood and people listen to understand. Laughing and smiling is another way to do such, although it has slightly different implications. Some people overly do it (laugh when nothings funny), and I think that’s trying a bit too hard. I catch myself doing it all the time — feeling foolish afterwards if people catch me not really getting the joke and just laughing because I want to look like I understand. I should really stop.. Like I said, i don’t think full understanding is truly possible, so why pretend? Pretending is not awesome, unless you're acting for sport.

jump

Developing a thought on a previous blog post: I don’t think we align with circumstances and just work it out. I don’t know about twenty years of marriage, but I think it’s completely possible to find "the one”. I don’t think it’s a good idea to settle for less. With this hope in mind, we can all be less thirsty people and unpossessive and just have a good time. When I go out with the guys, there’s always some guys that are always trying to pull bitches, and somewhat sad when we don’t pull bitches (because we always end up not pulling the bitches). While it is a good time because it can be fun (also I’ve definitely been that guy before lol), I am now a proponent of awesomeness and that shit is not awesome.

Labels